Why Most Online Communities Fail and Typos Kill Stories

Ben Worthen at the WSJ blogs on a Deloitte study about how businesses overinvest in tech when building communities.

1. Going out with the claim that 60% of businesses invest over $1 million in online communities thanks to a Deloitte typo that should have stated 6% is not a great way to get off on the right credibility foot. Worthen does the correction, but …

2. The comments on the post are cluttered with community vendors, imagine that.

3. “Community” as a term, is tired and over-fraught with implications of good will, social good, and cooperation among customers and companies.

4. This is bad research on a tired topic.

“One of the hot investments for businesses these days is online communities that help customers feel connected to a brand. But most of these efforts produce fancy Web sites that few people ever visit. The problem: Businesses are focusing on the value an online community can provide to themselves, not the community.”

Business Technology : Why Most Online Communities Fail.

Author: David Churbuck

Cape Codder with an itch to write

0 thoughts on “Why Most Online Communities Fail and Typos Kill Stories”

  1. Not such a good investment when your community fails and gets feces all over a brand that otherwise was doing well on it’s own.

    And yes, it really stinks when you rely on a source and they give you bad info.

    “You screwed up, you trusted us…” Animal House

  2. David:

    I saw that one too – and the typo ruined it.

    Regardless of the type – the community vendors were scrambling hard to pull the curtain back up.

    My take on it here (social media madness – build it and they will come)

    http://tinyurl.com/685e3x

    TO’B

Leave a Reply to Mark CahillCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Churbuck.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading